<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 41 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396372</link>
    <description>The appeal for A.Y. 2007-08 was dismissed as withdrawn. However, for A.Y. 2008-09 and 2009-10, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the application of section 50C and the adoption of the cost of acquisition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming that the indexed cost of acquisition should be computed with reference to the year the previous owner held the asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 41 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396372</link>
      <description>The appeal for A.Y. 2007-08 was dismissed as withdrawn. However, for A.Y. 2008-09 and 2009-10, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the application of section 50C and the adoption of the cost of acquisition. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming that the indexed cost of acquisition should be computed with reference to the year the previous owner held the asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>