<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 32 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-In-Original, confirming the absolute confiscation of gold bars and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant&#039;s claims of personal use, retracted statement, and non-applicability of legal provisions were rejected, highlighting the intent to evade customs duty. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the confiscation and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 32 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-In-Original, confirming the absolute confiscation of gold bars and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant&#039;s claims of personal use, retracted statement, and non-applicability of legal provisions were rejected, highlighting the intent to evade customs duty. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the confiscation and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>