<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the payment made by the assessee to the foreign company under the licensing agreement was allowable as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal determined that the expenditure did not result in the acquisition of a capital asset and was related to the use of technical know-how, thus qualifying as business expenditure. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by a Supreme Court ruling, and both issues were decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:26:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the payment made by the assessee to the foreign company under the licensing agreement was allowable as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal determined that the expenditure did not result in the acquisition of a capital asset and was related to the use of technical know-how, thus qualifying as business expenditure. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by a Supreme Court ruling, and both issues were decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>