<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 14 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396345</link>
    <description>Circular No. 723 treats the shipping business of non-residents as a self-contained code, so tax deduction provisions under sections 194C and 195 did not apply to ocean freight paid through the statutory shipping mechanism; the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deleted. The addition for the account difference with M/s Eskay Sales Corporation failed because the discrepancy was an old carried-forward balance from earlier years and not a fresh year-specific item; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance from travelling and miscellaneous expenses was unjustified because no specific defect in the audited books was identified; the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 14 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396345</link>
      <description>Circular No. 723 treats the shipping business of non-residents as a self-contained code, so tax deduction provisions under sections 194C and 195 did not apply to ocean freight paid through the statutory shipping mechanism; the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deleted. The addition for the account difference with M/s Eskay Sales Corporation failed because the discrepancy was an old carried-forward balance from earlier years and not a fresh year-specific item; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance from travelling and miscellaneous expenses was unjustified because no specific defect in the audited books was identified; the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>