<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 10 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directing admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A. The Tribunal emphasized substantial justice and procedural adherence, instructing the CIT(A) to decide the issues on merit with ample opportunity for both parties. The appeal was pronounced on 20th March 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 10 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and directing admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A. The Tribunal emphasized substantial justice and procedural adherence, instructing the CIT(A) to decide the issues on merit with ample opportunity for both parties. The appeal was pronounced on 20th March 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>