<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22637</link>
    <description>The court held that the entire value of the trust property was included in the net wealth of the trustees due to the indeterminate nature of Hemant&#039;s interest. Consequently, the trustees were liable to pay wealth-tax on the entire trust property. The reassessment of the trustees based on the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed valid for the assessment year 1958-59 but invalid for subsequent years as no new information was provided. Hemant&#039;s interest was not included in his net wealth, affirming the trustees&#039; liability for wealth-tax. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on most issues, except for the validity of reassessment based on the Tribunal&#039;s order for certain years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22637</link>
      <description>The court held that the entire value of the trust property was included in the net wealth of the trustees due to the indeterminate nature of Hemant&#039;s interest. Consequently, the trustees were liable to pay wealth-tax on the entire trust property. The reassessment of the trustees based on the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed valid for the assessment year 1958-59 but invalid for subsequent years as no new information was provided. Hemant&#039;s interest was not included in his net wealth, affirming the trustees&#039; liability for wealth-tax. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on most issues, except for the validity of reassessment based on the Tribunal&#039;s order for certain years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>