https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288821 The Scheduled Districts Act, 1874 was treated as authorising rules that regulated the procedure of officers administering civil and criminal justice in backward areas, and the 1937 Naga Hills Rules were held within that power. The Court further noted that the rule-making scheme did not amount to excessive delegation because the statutory purpose and framework supplied sufficient legislative guidance. Those Rules were also held to survive repeal of the parent Act through saving provisions and later continuation and adaptation laws in Nagaland. On constitutional review, the special criminal procedure was not found inconsistent with Articles 14 or 21 because the differentiation reflected the conditions of the area and constituted law. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2020 10:19:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288821 The Scheduled Districts Act, 1874 was treated as authorising rules that regulated the procedure of officers administering civil and criminal justice in backward areas, and the 1937 Naga Hills Rules were held within that power. The Court further noted that the rule-making scheme did not amount to excessive delegation because the statutory purpose and framework supplied sufficient legislative guidance. Those Rules were also held to survive repeal of the parent Act through saving provisions and later continuation and adaptation laws in Nagaland. On constitutional review, the special criminal procedure was not found inconsistent with Articles 14 or 21 because the differentiation reflected the conditions of the area and constituted law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288821