https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396330 Fusible interlining cloth was examined against competing tariff headings 5208, 5209, 5212 and 5903 under the Customs Tariff Act. The product was found to be a textile coated with plastic on one side and produced through a dot-printing process rather than weaving or interlacing, so it did not fit the description of woven cotton fabrics under headings 5208, 5209 or 5212. The visible dotted pattern was treated as part of the coating process and did not take the goods out of Chapter 59. The goods were therefore classifiable under heading 5903. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396330 Fusible interlining cloth was examined against competing tariff headings 5208, 5209, 5212 and 5903 under the Customs Tariff Act. The product was found to be a textile coated with plastic on one side and produced through a dot-printing process rather than weaving or interlacing, so it did not fit the description of woven cotton fabrics under headings 5208, 5209 or 5212. The visible dotted pattern was treated as part of the coating process and did not take the goods out of Chapter 59. The goods were therefore classifiable under heading 5903. Case-Laws GST Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396330