<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 385 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal vacated the penalty imposed by the Wealth-tax Officer under the Wealth-tax Act, citing the invalidity of the show-cause notice as &quot;ab initio void.&quot; The Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable and dismissed the revenue&#039;s application, as the order did not raise a question of law warranting reference to the High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on factual findings regarding the notice&#039;s invalidity, emphasizing no estoppel against law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 385 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal vacated the penalty imposed by the Wealth-tax Officer under the Wealth-tax Act, citing the invalidity of the show-cause notice as &quot;ab initio void.&quot; The Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable and dismissed the revenue&#039;s application, as the order did not raise a question of law warranting reference to the High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on factual findings regarding the notice&#039;s invalidity, emphasizing no estoppel against law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>