<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22629</link>
    <description>Ex gratia or customary bonus paid to employees under a settlement, over and above the statutory bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, was held allowable as a deduction where the payment was made consistently in earlier years and was commercially expedient. The court accepted that the statutory bonus regime does not exhaust all bonus payments, and that deductibility depends on the surrounding business circumstances and reasonableness of the outlay. Because the payment was made wholly and exclusively for business purposes to maintain employer-employee relations, secure industrial peace, and avoid strikes or lock-outs, it satisfied the test for business expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22629</link>
      <description>Ex gratia or customary bonus paid to employees under a settlement, over and above the statutory bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, was held allowable as a deduction where the payment was made consistently in earlier years and was commercially expedient. The court accepted that the statutory bonus regime does not exhaust all bonus payments, and that deductibility depends on the surrounding business circumstances and reasonableness of the outlay. Because the payment was made wholly and exclusively for business purposes to maintain employer-employee relations, secure industrial peace, and avoid strikes or lock-outs, it satisfied the test for business expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>