<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 692 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396317</link>
    <description>Online dissemination of copyrighted drawings through a procurement portal can found territorial jurisdiction where the alleged infringing acts of storage, communication to the public, and availability for download occur in the forum. However, where the copyright and use-rights dispute is inseparably linked to contractual entitlements traced through an insolvency resolution process and resolution plan, the controversy falls within the insolvency forum and civil court jurisdiction is barred. The suit was also vulnerable for non-impleadment of necessary parties, because the original contracting entity and the special purpose vehicle were essential to determine whether rights were lawfully transferred, modified, or extinguished.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 692 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396317</link>
      <description>Online dissemination of copyrighted drawings through a procurement portal can found territorial jurisdiction where the alleged infringing acts of storage, communication to the public, and availability for download occur in the forum. However, where the copyright and use-rights dispute is inseparably linked to contractual entitlements traced through an insolvency resolution process and resolution plan, the controversy falls within the insolvency forum and civil court jurisdiction is barred. The suit was also vulnerable for non-impleadment of necessary parties, because the original contracting entity and the special purpose vehicle were essential to determine whether rights were lawfully transferred, modified, or extinguished.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>