<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 689 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396314</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order for fresh bidding was set aside for exceeding its jurisdiction by interfering with the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial decision. Appeals challenging the evaluation process, alleging bias, and contesting the bid amount were dismissed. The case was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority for approval of the Resolution Plan in line with the given directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 689 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396314</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order for fresh bidding was set aside for exceeding its jurisdiction by interfering with the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial decision. Appeals challenging the evaluation process, alleging bias, and contesting the bid amount were dismissed. The case was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority for approval of the Resolution Plan in line with the given directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>