<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 684 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396309</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the revised assessment order for the assessment year 2004-05, which was solely based on electricity consumption without proper verification of the petitioner&#039;s books of accounts. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice and proper verification before passing revised orders, the Court remanded the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to file objections afresh with necessary documents, and the respondent was directed to pass appropriate orders within four weeks after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed without costs, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 684 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396309</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the revised assessment order for the assessment year 2004-05, which was solely based on electricity consumption without proper verification of the petitioner&#039;s books of accounts. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice and proper verification before passing revised orders, the Court remanded the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to file objections afresh with necessary documents, and the respondent was directed to pass appropriate orders within four weeks after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed without costs, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>