<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1640 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288803</link>
    <description>Internet-based trademark disputes may attract territorial jurisdiction where the defendant&#039;s website and social media activity are shown prima facie to target the forum state for commercial engagement, not merely remain passively accessible. A well-known trademark may also receive protection beyond its registered class, so a deceptively similar mark used in a corporate name or trading style can support injunctive relief even where the defendant claims different services or absence of registration in that class. The note also explains that admissions of ownership, prior use, registrations and other material facts may justify commercial summary disposal and judgment on admissions when no plausible defence remains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1640 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288803</link>
      <description>Internet-based trademark disputes may attract territorial jurisdiction where the defendant&#039;s website and social media activity are shown prima facie to target the forum state for commercial engagement, not merely remain passively accessible. A well-known trademark may also receive protection beyond its registered class, so a deceptively similar mark used in a corporate name or trading style can support injunctive relief even where the defendant claims different services or absence of registration in that class. The note also explains that admissions of ownership, prior use, registrations and other material facts may justify commercial summary disposal and judgment on admissions when no plausible defence remains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>