<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1179 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288795</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed without prior notice and without giving the assessee an opportunity to file objections and be heard could not be sustained. The court noted that the challenge based on non-compliance with Rule 52 was not refuted, and held that absence of notice and hearing vitiated the assessment. The assessment order was set aside, while the respondent was permitted to restart proceedings in accordance with law by issuing notice, considering objections and then passing a fresh order after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:54:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1179 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288795</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed without prior notice and without giving the assessee an opportunity to file objections and be heard could not be sustained. The court noted that the challenge based on non-compliance with Rule 52 was not refuted, and held that absence of notice and hearing vitiated the assessment. The assessment order was set aside, while the respondent was permitted to restart proceedings in accordance with law by issuing notice, considering objections and then passing a fresh order after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>