https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288793 The 1951 Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act changed the forum for future proceedings, but Section 103(j) saved suits, applications and other proceedings already pending at commencement, while Section 103(k) preserved the remedies available in those matters. Section 93 operated prospectively and did not bar continuation of pending cases. A party was held to retain a vested substantive right to have a matter tried in the forum where it was validly instituted unless the statute clearly provided otherwise. The District Court therefore retained jurisdiction over pending matters commenced under the repealed Act, subject to transfer under Section 24 CPC. en-us Tue, 04 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:47:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288793 The 1951 Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act changed the forum for future proceedings, but Section 103(j) saved suits, applications and other proceedings already pending at commencement, while Section 103(k) preserved the remedies available in those matters. Section 93 operated prospectively and did not bar continuation of pending cases. A party was held to retain a vested substantive right to have a matter tried in the forum where it was validly instituted unless the statute clearly provided otherwise. The District Court therefore retained jurisdiction over pending matters commenced under the repealed Act, subject to transfer under Section 24 CPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288793