<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 88 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22621</link>
    <description>Disclosure of prize money receipts in Part IV of the return was treated as sufficient to negate concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars for penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The earlier view applied was that disclosure in Part IV does not amount to concealment where the relevant income particulars are placed on record, so the Revenue&#039;s objection that the income was not fully and truly disclosed failed. On that basis, the penalty was cancelled and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 88 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22621</link>
      <description>Disclosure of prize money receipts in Part IV of the return was treated as sufficient to negate concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars for penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The earlier view applied was that disclosure in Part IV does not amount to concealment where the relevant income particulars are placed on record, so the Revenue&#039;s objection that the income was not fully and truly disclosed failed. On that basis, the penalty was cancelled and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>