https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288781 In matters of municipal contracts and public largesse, the Court held that Article 226 review is confined to checking arbitrariness and cannot be used to substitute judicial terms for those of the statutory authority. The Corporation retained discretion over how to establish, maintain and regulate the slaughter house, and such contracts should ordinarily be awarded through open tender or auction to ensure transparency and equality. As the impugned advertisement inviting bids disclosed no arbitrariness, discrimination or mala fides, the High Court could not direct grant of a 10-year contract or fix its terms. The writ judgment was set aside and the Corporation was left to proceed afresh in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:20:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288781 In matters of municipal contracts and public largesse, the Court held that Article 226 review is confined to checking arbitrariness and cannot be used to substitute judicial terms for those of the statutory authority. The Corporation retained discretion over how to establish, maintain and regulate the slaughter house, and such contracts should ordinarily be awarded through open tender or auction to ensure transparency and equality. As the impugned advertisement inviting bids disclosed no arbitrariness, discrimination or mala fides, the High Court could not direct grant of a 10-year contract or fix its terms. The writ judgment was set aside and the Corporation was left to proceed afresh in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288781