https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288778 A renewed request to stay a trademark suit was held not maintainable because earlier binding orders had already ined that rectification proceedings could be initiated only after the Court's prima facie satisfaction on invalidity where no rectification was pending. Having accepted those findings and acted on them for years, the defendant could not reopen the same procedural objection on the same factual matrix. The renewed application was treated as an attempt to approbate and reprobate and as an abuse of process, contrary to judicial discipline, and was dismissed. en-us Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288778 A renewed request to stay a trademark suit was held not maintainable because earlier binding orders had already ined that rectification proceedings could be initiated only after the Court's prima facie satisfaction on invalidity where no rectification was pending. Having accepted those findings and acted on them for years, the defendant could not reopen the same procedural objection on the same factual matrix. The renewed application was treated as an attempt to approbate and reprobate and as an abuse of process, contrary to judicial discipline, and was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288778