<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 661 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396286</link>
    <description>Pendency of SARFAESI enforcement measures does not bar a financial creditor from initiating or continuing a section 7 insolvency application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as the Code&#039;s overriding effect permits parallel remedies where debt and default are otherwise established. Simultaneous invocation of SARFAESI and insolvency remedies, by itself, does not amount to forum shopping or to fraudulent or malicious initiation, and mere disclosure of prior SARFAESI action is not suppression of material facts. The order under comment states that section 65 is not attracted on these facts, and the contrary view was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 661 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396286</link>
      <description>Pendency of SARFAESI enforcement measures does not bar a financial creditor from initiating or continuing a section 7 insolvency application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as the Code&#039;s overriding effect permits parallel remedies where debt and default are otherwise established. Simultaneous invocation of SARFAESI and insolvency remedies, by itself, does not amount to forum shopping or to fraudulent or malicious initiation, and mere disclosure of prior SARFAESI action is not suppression of material facts. The order under comment states that section 65 is not attracted on these facts, and the contrary view was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>