<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise Case Demand Dismissed Due to Lack of Solid Evidence; Disputed Documents Insufficient for Allegations of Clandestine Removal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53861</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal - The allegation/observation of suppression of production and clandestine removal is a serious allegation and it has to be established by the investigation by affirmative and cogent evidence, which is absent in the Order –in-original except relying upon such documents and entries there in, which has been disputed by the Appellant - Demand set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:20:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise Case Demand Dismissed Due to Lack of Solid Evidence; Disputed Documents Insufficient for Allegations of Clandestine Removal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53861</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal - The allegation/observation of suppression of production and clandestine removal is a serious allegation and it has to be established by the investigation by affirmative and cogent evidence, which is absent in the Order –in-original except relying upon such documents and entries there in, which has been disputed by the Appellant - Demand set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:20:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>