<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 647 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the commission expenses were genuine and met the requirements under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the payments were for legitimate business purposes, supported by documentation, and paid through proper channels. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s concerns about the authenticity of the commissions, directing the AO to permit the claimed expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 647 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the commission expenses were genuine and met the requirements under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the payments were for legitimate business purposes, supported by documentation, and paid through proper channels. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s concerns about the authenticity of the commissions, directing the AO to permit the claimed expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>