<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 84 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288770</link>
    <description>A notice issued naming an addressee in more than one capacity (executor and trustee) does not become invalid merely for describing dual capacities; the applicable principle permits the taxpayer to state or clarify the capacity when responding and does not require the tax authority to pre determine capacity. The analysis rejects the view that such proceedings are necessarily penal so as to mandate prior determination of capacity, and recognises that administration completion may alter roles (executor ceasing, trustee continuing); accordingly, a dual capacity notice is operatively valid and the assessment was not required to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 84 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288770</link>
      <description>A notice issued naming an addressee in more than one capacity (executor and trustee) does not become invalid merely for describing dual capacities; the applicable principle permits the taxpayer to state or clarify the capacity when responding and does not require the tax authority to pre determine capacity. The analysis rejects the view that such proceedings are necessarily penal so as to mandate prior determination of capacity, and recognises that administration completion may alter roles (executor ceasing, trustee continuing); accordingly, a dual capacity notice is operatively valid and the assessment was not required to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>