<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1362 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288768</link>
    <description>GST refund for work executed was treated as admissible on the respondent&#039;s statement, and the competent authority was directed to take steps to refund the amount to the petitioner within one month. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the refund timeline recorded as part of the operative directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1362 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288768</link>
      <description>GST refund for work executed was treated as admissible on the respondent&#039;s statement, and the competent authority was directed to take steps to refund the amount to the petitioner within one month. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the refund timeline recorded as part of the operative directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>