<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 620 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396245</link>
    <description>Refund scrutiny required fresh examination where the Chartered Accountant certificate supporting the claim was questioned because it had been issued after the death of the concerned accountant. The Tribunal accepted that a new certificate issued by another Chartered Accountant and the refund conditions needed reconsideration in accordance with law, so the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh look at the evidence and compliance requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 620 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396245</link>
      <description>Refund scrutiny required fresh examination where the Chartered Accountant certificate supporting the claim was questioned because it had been issued after the death of the concerned accountant. The Tribunal accepted that a new certificate issued by another Chartered Accountant and the refund conditions needed reconsideration in accordance with law, so the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh look at the evidence and compliance requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>