https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288762 Preventive detention beyond three months requires the safeguard of an advisory board unless Parliament validly displaces that safeguard under Article 22(7)(a) by prescribing both the exceptional circumstances and the class or classes of cases in which longer detention may be authorised. Section 17A failed this test because it merely restated broad statutory heads of detention instead of specifying the required exceptional circumstances and classes of cases. It was therefore unconstitutional for non-compliance with Article 22(7)(a), and detention founded on it could not stand. en-us Thu, 19 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2020 15:06:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288762 Preventive detention beyond three months requires the safeguard of an advisory board unless Parliament validly displaces that safeguard under Article 22(7)(a) by prescribing both the exceptional circumstances and the class or classes of cases in which longer detention may be authorised. Section 17A failed this test because it merely restated broad statutory heads of detention instead of specifying the required exceptional circumstances and classes of cases. It was therefore unconstitutional for non-compliance with Article 22(7)(a), and detention founded on it could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288762