https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288758 The court affirmed the Subordinate Judge's decree, dismissing the appeal with costs. The properties standing in the name of Bhuban Mohini were deemed part of the family estate, not her self-acquisition. The argument that properties acquired with her husband's money constituted an absolute gift to her was rejected due to inconsistent pleadings and lack of opportunity for the opposing party to contest. The court upheld the order for recovery of joint properties not initially included in the suit, emphasizing the importance of including all joint properties in litigation. en-us Tue, 28 Aug 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:51:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288758 The court affirmed the Subordinate Judge's decree, dismissing the appeal with costs. The properties standing in the name of Bhuban Mohini were deemed part of the family estate, not her self-acquisition. The argument that properties acquired with her husband's money constituted an absolute gift to her was rejected due to inconsistent pleadings and lack of opportunity for the opposing party to contest. The court upheld the order for recovery of joint properties not initially included in the suit, emphasizing the importance of including all joint properties in litigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Aug 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288758