https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288757 A plea of benami requires legal proof of the real source of purchase money and the true character of the transaction; suspicion or later conduct is insufficient to displace the apparent tenor of the deeds. On the materials discussed, the purchases in the names of Abdul Majid and Abdul Azim were not shown to be benami or fictitious. The plaintiffs also failed to trace a subsisting share or title in Budhiamara, including the disputed and indigo factory lands, because the documentary materials did not establish a separate mouza or an effective under-tenure. The evidence on possession and limitation likewise favoured the defendants, so the decree below was affirmed. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288757 A plea of benami requires legal proof of the real source of purchase money and the true character of the transaction; suspicion or later conduct is insufficient to displace the apparent tenor of the deeds. On the materials discussed, the purchases in the names of Abdul Majid and Abdul Azim were not shown to be benami or fictitious. The plaintiffs also failed to trace a subsisting share or title in Budhiamara, including the disputed and indigo factory lands, because the documentary materials did not establish a separate mouza or an effective under-tenure. The evidence on possession and limitation likewise favoured the defendants, so the decree below was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Aug 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288757