https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288751 The Privy Council disagreed with the Supreme Court's judgment and declared that the property purchases were benamee transactions. The Appellant and Respondent were deemed trustees for Rogoram Gosain, the absolute and beneficial owner of the properties. The property was part of his estate at the time of his death. The case was remitted back to the Supreme Court with directions to give effect to this report and Her Majesty's Order in Council, including a declaration to avoid further litigation between the parties. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 1854 00:00:00 +0553 Wed, 06 Jan 2021 14:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288751 The Privy Council disagreed with the Supreme Court's judgment and declared that the property purchases were benamee transactions. The Appellant and Respondent were deemed trustees for Rogoram Gosain, the absolute and beneficial owner of the properties. The property was part of his estate at the time of his death. The case was remitted back to the Supreme Court with directions to give effect to this report and Her Majesty's Order in Council, including a declaration to avoid further litigation between the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jul 1854 00:00:00 +0553 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288751