https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288750 Beneficial ownership in a benami arrangement was held to follow the real owner proved by the evidence, not the apparent transferee. The surrounding transactions did not show that Bohu Begum acquired the whole estate beneficially; her title was confined to the one-fourth share inherited from Abdur Rahman. On limitation, the suit was held to be in time because adverse possession for twelve years before suit was not established under Article 144. Relief was adjusted accordingly: the one anna share was included in the decree and the condition requiring payment of the whole mokurari rent was removed. en-us Wed, 21 Jul 1886 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288750 Beneficial ownership in a benami arrangement was held to follow the real owner proved by the evidence, not the apparent transferee. The surrounding transactions did not show that Bohu Begum acquired the whole estate beneficially; her title was confined to the one-fourth share inherited from Abdur Rahman. On limitation, the suit was held to be in time because adverse possession for twelve years before suit was not established under Article 144. Relief was adjusted accordingly: the one anna share was included in the decree and the condition requiring payment of the whole mokurari rent was removed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Jul 1886 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288750