https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288749 The court found that the Panchannagram properties remained part of Raj Mohan's estate as transactions transferring them to Nishadini were deemed fictitious due to lack of evidence of consideration and possession. The Calcutta house was also considered part of the estate, with the transfer to Nishadini seen as for the estate's benefit. Gauti tenures were to revert to the estate upon Nishadini's death. The executor was not held liable for the sale of the Calcutta house. Directions for marriage expenses and costs of the suit and appeal were clarified, with estate funds covering incurred costs. The decree was modified to allow leases instead of sales for estate debts. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:49:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288749 The court found that the Panchannagram properties remained part of Raj Mohan's estate as transactions transferring them to Nishadini were deemed fictitious due to lack of evidence of consideration and possession. The Calcutta house was also considered part of the estate, with the transfer to Nishadini seen as for the estate's benefit. Gauti tenures were to revert to the estate upon Nishadini's death. The executor was not held liable for the sale of the Calcutta house. Directions for marriage expenses and costs of the suit and appeal were clarified, with estate funds covering incurred costs. The decree was modified to allow leases instead of sales for estate debts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288749