https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396241 Inherent jurisdiction should not normally be used to interfere with the mode of investigation, which remains within the investigating officer's domain, but complaints of harassment during enquiry cannot be ignored. The Court therefore issued limited protective directions: persons summoned for enquiry or investigation must be called through written summons under Section 160 CrPC specifying the date and time, the minutes of enquiry must be recorded in the relevant diary, and investigating officers must avoid harassment. It also required compliance with the Supreme Court guidelines on preliminary enquiry and FIR registration. No general interference with the pending enquiry or investigation was granted. en-us Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396241 Inherent jurisdiction should not normally be used to interfere with the mode of investigation, which remains within the investigating officer's domain, but complaints of harassment during enquiry cannot be ignored. The Court therefore issued limited protective directions: persons summoned for enquiry or investigation must be called through written summons under Section 160 CrPC specifying the date and time, the minutes of enquiry must be recorded in the relevant diary, and investigating officers must avoid harassment. It also required compliance with the Supreme Court guidelines on preliminary enquiry and FIR registration. No general interference with the pending enquiry or investigation was granted. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396241