<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 610 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not sustainable due to the defective penalty notice. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 610 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not sustainable due to the defective penalty notice. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>