<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 606 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside lower authorities&#039; orders and deleting the entire addition of Rs. 32,50,000. The reassessment proceedings were flawed due to lack of evidence and cross-examination, with no material justifying the addition. The Tribunal emphasized the Revenue&#039;s failure to prove the payment, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition. The issue of reopening the assessment was considered academic after the deletion of the addition on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 606 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside lower authorities&#039; orders and deleting the entire addition of Rs. 32,50,000. The reassessment proceedings were flawed due to lack of evidence and cross-examination, with no material justifying the addition. The Tribunal emphasized the Revenue&#039;s failure to prove the payment, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition. The issue of reopening the assessment was considered academic after the deletion of the addition on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>