<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 604 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396229</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiries were adequate, and the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the Principal Commissioner lacked justification for invoking Section 263, as the AO had conducted thorough inquiries and taken a reasonable stance on commission payments&#039; allowability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:16:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 604 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396229</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiries were adequate, and the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the Principal Commissioner lacked justification for invoking Section 263, as the AO had conducted thorough inquiries and taken a reasonable stance on commission payments&#039; allowability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>