<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1572 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment order to be irregular but not illegal regarding the jurisdiction issue. The matter was remanded for a de-novo assessment by a competent officer, either an ACIT or DCIT. The Tribunal held that the ITO lacked competence to assess income exceeding the specified limit, setting aside the assessment order and directing a fresh assessment by a competent officer. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. Other grounds raised did not require separate adjudication in light of the decision on jurisdictional issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1572 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment order to be irregular but not illegal regarding the jurisdiction issue. The matter was remanded for a de-novo assessment by a competent officer, either an ACIT or DCIT. The Tribunal held that the ITO lacked competence to assess income exceeding the specified limit, setting aside the assessment order and directing a fresh assessment by a competent officer. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. Other grounds raised did not require separate adjudication in light of the decision on jurisdictional issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>