https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288740 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the validity of promotions of respondents 4 to 24 to Supertime Grade II. The appellant's claim for promotion was rejected as he lacked standing to challenge promotions in specialities other than ophthalmology. The court found no legal malice in post creation and deemed the appellant unqualified for the Simla post. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs, and the appellant's contention regarding promotion from September 1971 was rejected due to lack of qualification and refusal of previous promotion opportunities. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:34:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288740 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the validity of promotions of respondents 4 to 24 to Supertime Grade II. The appellant's claim for promotion was rejected as he lacked standing to challenge promotions in specialities other than ophthalmology. The court found no legal malice in post creation and deemed the appellant unqualified for the Simla post. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without costs, and the appellant's contention regarding promotion from September 1971 was rejected due to lack of qualification and refusal of previous promotion opportunities. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288740