<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner cannot be prosecuted u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without company as co-accused.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53835</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - Framing of Charges - Vicarious Liability against the company or not - A demand notice was served only on the petitioner/accused, there was no demand notice against company, therefore, without arraying the company as an accused in complaint case, the petitioner can not be prosecuted for the offence of Section 138 N.I. Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:48:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:48:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner cannot be prosecuted u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without company as co-accused.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53835</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - Framing of Charges - Vicarious Liability against the company or not - A demand notice was served only on the petitioner/accused, there was no demand notice against company, therefore, without arraying the company as an accused in complaint case, the petitioner can not be prosecuted for the offence of Section 138 N.I. Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:48:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>