<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 589 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396214</link>
    <description>The court held that without including the company as an accused, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The order of the JMFC Narsinghpur was overturned, granting relief to the petitioner and permitting them to seek alternative remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:48:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 589 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396214</link>
      <description>The court held that without including the company as an accused, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The order of the JMFC Narsinghpur was overturned, granting relief to the petitioner and permitting them to seek alternative remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>