<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288732</link>
    <description>Non-supply of a remand order relied upon in a detention case can violate the detenu&#039;s right to make an effective representation when the document is necessary for rebuttal or may contain material not fully reflected in the sponsoring authority&#039;s report. The detaining authority must furnish such a document if requested, and cannot refuse it merely on its own view that it is unnecessary. On these facts, the denial of the remand order prejudiced the detenu&#039;s constitutional opportunity to represent his case and vitiated the continued detention, leading to release unless required in any other case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288732</link>
      <description>Non-supply of a remand order relied upon in a detention case can violate the detenu&#039;s right to make an effective representation when the document is necessary for rebuttal or may contain material not fully reflected in the sponsoring authority&#039;s report. The detaining authority must furnish such a document if requested, and cannot refuse it merely on its own view that it is unnecessary. On these facts, the denial of the remand order prejudiced the detenu&#039;s constitutional opportunity to represent his case and vitiated the continued detention, leading to release unless required in any other case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>