<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 129 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288728</link>
    <description>A registered assessee-firm could not set off its share of loss from an unregistered joint venture against its own income, because the governing rule from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Jadavji Narsidas &amp; Co. limited such loss to set-off only against the income of that unregistered firm. The fact that the department had not assessed the unregistered entity, or had not taken action under the relevant provision, did not change that legal position. The prior view allowing the set-off was therefore no longer good law, and the claim was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 129 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288728</link>
      <description>A registered assessee-firm could not set off its share of loss from an unregistered joint venture against its own income, because the governing rule from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Jadavji Narsidas &amp; Co. limited such loss to set-off only against the income of that unregistered firm. The fact that the department had not assessed the unregistered entity, or had not taken action under the relevant provision, did not change that legal position. The prior view allowing the set-off was therefore no longer good law, and the claim was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>