https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396213 The court upheld the lower courts' judgments, dismissing the plaintiff's suit due to it being barred under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and for non-joinder of necessary parties. It was found that the properties were not self-acquired by the plaintiff, and Defendant No. 1 had the right to execute the Power of Attorney. The second appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was identified. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:09:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396213 The court upheld the lower courts' judgments, dismissing the plaintiff's suit due to it being barred under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and for non-joinder of necessary parties. It was found that the properties were not self-acquired by the plaintiff, and Defendant No. 1 had the right to execute the Power of Attorney. The second appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was identified. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396213