https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396207 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of the addition made on account of unabsorbed investment allowance. The ITAT found that the assessee had satisfied the conditions of section 32A(6), warranting the allowance of the claim. en-us Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396207 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of the addition made on account of unabsorbed investment allowance. The ITAT found that the assessee had satisfied the conditions of section 32A(6), warranting the allowance of the claim. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396207