https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288718 The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions to grant relief against forfeiture to the tenant. The court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the discretion exercised by the lower courts, especially given the circumstances suggesting that the landlord may have made it difficult for the tenant to pay rent. The appeal failed, and costs were awarded to the respondent. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:22:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288718 The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions to grant relief against forfeiture to the tenant. The court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the discretion exercised by the lower courts, especially given the circumstances suggesting that the landlord may have made it difficult for the tenant to pay rent. The appeal failed, and costs were awarded to the respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288718