<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 191 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288710</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Sections 23(1)(a), 23(1)(b), 23-D, and 23-F of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, dismissing challenges against them. It limited the applicability of the Criminal Procedure Code to investigations under the Act and affirmed the jurisdiction of the Special Police Establishment to investigate offenses within a State. The court dismissed all petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:34:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 191 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288710</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Sections 23(1)(a), 23(1)(b), 23-D, and 23-F of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, dismissing challenges against them. It limited the applicability of the Criminal Procedure Code to investigations under the Act and affirmed the jurisdiction of the Special Police Establishment to investigate offenses within a State. The court dismissed all petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>