https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288708 The High Court allowed the appeal, reversing the Civil Judge's decree. It directed the plaintiff to deposit Rs. 30,000 in the lower court within one month. Upon deposit, the defendant was to execute a sale deed for the suit properties. If the defendant failed to do so, the court would execute the deed. The decree for specific performance was made, but the plaintiff was not entitled to mesne profits until the entire consideration was deposited. The jurisdiction of the Mamlatdar under Section 84C or Section 70(mb) remained unaffected by the High Court's decree. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:51:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288708 The High Court allowed the appeal, reversing the Civil Judge's decree. It directed the plaintiff to deposit Rs. 30,000 in the lower court within one month. Upon deposit, the defendant was to execute a sale deed for the suit properties. If the defendant failed to do so, the court would execute the deed. The decree for specific performance was made, but the plaintiff was not entitled to mesne profits until the entire consideration was deposited. The jurisdiction of the Mamlatdar under Section 84C or Section 70(mb) remained unaffected by the High Court's decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288708