<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 576 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396201</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging tax and interest demands under the GST Act, 2017, and the validity of registration. The petitioner&#039;s use of a deactivated PAN number for GST filings led to the issuance of orders. Despite arguments of compliance difficulties, the court found no merit, emphasizing the lack of bonafide mistake and the effective cancellation of registration from 30.11.2019. The court suggested the petitioner appeal under the GST Act if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 576 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396201</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging tax and interest demands under the GST Act, 2017, and the validity of registration. The petitioner&#039;s use of a deactivated PAN number for GST filings led to the issuance of orders. Despite arguments of compliance difficulties, the court found no merit, emphasizing the lack of bonafide mistake and the effective cancellation of registration from 30.11.2019. The court suggested the petitioner appeal under the GST Act if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>