<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 572 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396197</link>
    <description>The HC remitted the case concerning the disallowance of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of the IT Act to the assessing officer for further examination. The court found that the prior assessments did not adequately address whether the debt was previously offered to tax. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of without addressing the substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 572 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396197</link>
      <description>The HC remitted the case concerning the disallowance of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of the IT Act to the assessing officer for further examination. The court found that the prior assessments did not adequately address whether the debt was previously offered to tax. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of without addressing the substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>