<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Authorities Should Have Accepted Assessee&#039;s Accumulation Claim u/s 11 Despite Omission in Form-10 Purpose.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53825</link>
    <description>Exemption u/s 11 - The claim of assessee for accumulation ought to have been accepted by the revenue authorities. Even in the order of assessment the AO has accepted that Form-10 was filed by the assessee and the only grievance was that the purpose for accumulation was not mentioned. - No additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:16:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Authorities Should Have Accepted Assessee&#039;s Accumulation Claim u/s 11 Despite Omission in Form-10 Purpose.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53825</link>
      <description>Exemption u/s 11 - The claim of assessee for accumulation ought to have been accepted by the revenue authorities. Even in the order of assessment the AO has accepted that Form-10 was filed by the assessee and the only grievance was that the purpose for accumulation was not mentioned. - No additions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:16:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=53825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>