https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22588 A bona fide dispute as to entitlement to receive consideration can justify deposit of the amount with the Appropriate Authority under section 269UG(3), even without rival claimants, where the apparent recipient is itself challenging the acquisition provisions or vesting order. In that situation, tender is not mandatory and no revesting follows under section 269UH. Objections based on absence of probate, non-production of the original will, and the executors' authorisation were held unsustainable on the facts, because probate was not required, the will remained with the registering authority, and the executors acted under the will's authority. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22588 A bona fide dispute as to entitlement to receive consideration can justify deposit of the amount with the Appropriate Authority under section 269UG(3), even without rival claimants, where the apparent recipient is itself challenging the acquisition provisions or vesting order. In that situation, tender is not mandatory and no revesting follows under section 269UH. Objections based on absence of probate, non-production of the original will, and the executors' authorisation were held unsustainable on the facts, because probate was not required, the will remained with the registering authority, and the executors acted under the will's authority. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22588